Tuesday, June 26, 2018

Golden Rice, Misplaced Activism, and Who Do You Trust?

This blog raises an important question about who you choose to trust, and how easily they sway your opinions. When you read scientific information on the web, do you believe only what confirms your biases, or do you think critically about the information?  Are people manipulating you?

First, I love the idea of Golden Rice.  In many parts of the world food staples contain little Vitamin A, so those consuming rice, potato, wheat, maize, cassava, and banana are not receiving adequate nutrition.  It is essential for vision and optimal health. The result is a scourge of Vitamin A Deficiency (VAD) causes blindness and disease throughout the Developing World. 

Golden Rice has been genetically engineered with two genes to produce beta-carotene, the nutrient in carrots and leafy green vegetables that is converted to vitamin A in the body. 

Golden Rice is not without its issues. The levels were low in the first generation products and not necessarily in culturally-acceptable forms of rice.  Not everyone enjoys Uncle Ben's Boil-In-Bag Delight.

Plus, the Golden Rice people were outright dismissive (putting it mildly) when I asked them to be guests on the Talking Biotech Podcast and reach thousands of people with their messaging.  That was a huge turn off, and I blame them too for the lack of implementation of the product. With a strategy of "eff-off" to friendly media, it is no wonder why their product has no traction. 

FDA Evaluation

On May 24, 2018 the FDA approved Golden Rice for consumption in the USA, a curious move, because we will never consume it.  Folks here get plenty of vitamin A. 

However, when providing a product to the Developing World, many people are rightfully suspicious, and the endorsement of safety from the US-FDA is a good thing. It is symbolic. Period.

However, however, the FDA also stated that the levels of beta-carotene were not high enough to make a health claim.

Activists Pounce

Based on that last determination, a website called Independent Science News and others reported that the high beta-carotene rice has "no nutritional benefits".   This claim comes from Jonathan Latham, a guy that has fought science and scientists for years.  His website is a cornucopia of drivel. 




"No Nutritional Benefit" is what the activists claim, but is that what the FDA said?  Why are these groups bending the truth to stop a potentially helpful technology for the poor? 


The FDA's words were based on the USA-based intake of rice. At the levels present, and the frequency consumed, there is no likely benefit from Golden Rice as a dietary supplement.  It still has beta-carotene, it still has nutrition, there just can be no health claim in the USA on the label. 




Even influential food writer Michael Pollan cites the ISN misinterpretation without critical evaluation.


The FDA Responds

After activists and their mouthpieces willfully misinterpret the report, the FDA responded.  Marriana Naum wrote the following statement.  (bold is mine)


It is unfortunate that the statement you reference in our letter responding to BNF 158 has been misconstrued to suggest that there would be no value of the pro-vitamin A in golden rice for its use in the countries where it is intended for distribution.
Our statement applies only to labeling considerations in the United States, in that golden rice contains insufficient pro-vitamin A to warrant differential labeling for nutrient content based on the low levels of rice consumption in the U.S. Requirements for nutrient content claims on labels in the United States take two factors into account, the amount of the nutrient needed as well as it’s concentration in the food and the typical or average level of that food consumed in the U.S. For the rice to be labeled in the United States with a claim containing provitamin A, our regulations stipulate that the food must contain 10-19 percent of the RDI or DRV for the substance per reference amount customarily consumed (essentially a measure of consumption).
Additionally, U.S. consumers eat rice at very low levels compared to consumers in the specific Asian countries with vitamin A deficiency for which golden rice was developed. IRRI reports that consumption of rice by children in Bangladesh is 12.5 g/kg body weight/day, compared to about 0.5 g/kg bw/d for U.S. consumers). Rice is the major staple in those countries and levels of rice consumption are many-fold higher than they are in the U.S. While a U.S Consumer would be unlikely to eat enough of the rice to achieve that value (10-19 % of the NDI or RDA), that does not mean that the level of consumption of golden rice in the targeted countries would be insufficient to accomplish the intended effect of supplementing their very low consumption of vitamin A-containing foods. Consuming rice containing the levels of pro-vitamin A in GR2E rice as a staple of the diet could have a significant public health impact in populations that suffer from vitamin A deficiency.

You've Been Lied To.

Latham and others willfully misinterpreted the FDA report to buoy their sinking ship.  Activists have fought Golden Rice for decades because it represents a positive and almost free way to resolve a world health crisis, but it uses genetic engineering.  They must stop that technology from helping anyone at any cost, even if that means lying to their followers. 




Even trusted academics get it wrong.  Marion Nestle's blog repeats the same errant interpretation.  She also shows that it is ideology over evidence as she usually does. 

So if you are against big companies that make seeds for U.S. farmers, that's great.  But realize that when that contempt bleeds into altruistic applications of technology the blood is on your hands. 

This is just another stellar example of how groups manipulate their followers and confirm biases to drive ideological viewpoints that are inconsistent with the science.

Why Do You Trust Them?

This "debate" is about a product that is given away for free and could have a profound effect on the health and welfare of children all over the world.  The science is sound.  Why does Latham and others want this product to fail?  What's in it for them for children to continue to suffer from preventable blindness and disease? 

Please think about this carefully.  Are you being willingly deceived and defending corrupt opinions at the expense of the most vulnerable? 

15 comments:

Karl Haro von Mogel said...

The FDA approval of Golden Rice was not symbolic. It was a critical step in ensuring that there would be no trade disruption or uncertainty about future trade should countries like the Philippines or Bangladesh consider approving and growing it.

Thomas Baldwin said...

👏👏👏👏

Anonymous said...

As an outsider looking in it is hard to trust anyone these days. My biggest question after reading this blog, twice, is why the people at Golden Rice refused to talk to you.

Kevin M. Folta said...

I'd love to know too. They were absolute dicks about it. I won't talk to them now until they sort out how to work with people.

Kevin M. Folta said...

So you're saying that the Philippines and Bangladesh are going to be rice exporters to the USA? I'm not so sure about that, but I would love to see it for them.

Anonymous said...

It's extraordinary that they didn't take advantage of your offer! How recent was this?

Troy said...

Karl - different subject......when will the results of the squirrel/GMO corn study be shared?

Anonymous said...

I don't like supporting companies who are runs by assholes. Thanks for letting us know the truth behind the dicks at Golden Rice

Russell Wrobel said...

Who are the "Golden Rice People?" Is this a company set up to distribute Golden Rice? The developers? Are they affiliated with IRRI?

Karl Haro von Mogel said...

We're working on an update right now. Additional analyses have been added, and these are getting incorporated into the paper. Soon!

Anonymous said...

Strange. Not sure where my previous comment went. Anyway, I love your blog. Why wouldn't the people at Golden Rice agree to share their info? And why would they tell you to eff off? They must not know your podcast and the potential reach it could have. One concern with your twitter post on Marion Nestle. She wrote a very short article on the FDA ruling of GR. It was straight forward, no opinions. She didn't deceive. She even mentioned how the nutritional value was for the US since they don't eat as much rice just like you did. Not sure about Michael Pollan. But as for Nestle, she didn't mislead or deceive. Maybe you want to remove that.

Karl Haro von Mogel said...

Here is one article mentioning exports from the Philippines to the US. It only takes one unapproved grain to cause an incident.
https://www.philstar.com/business/2017/07/04/1716377/philippines-exports-organic-rice-uae-us

Evelyn Greenberg said...

This is disturbing. I had the pleasure of studying plants along side Peter Beyer at University of Freiburg in the mid 1990's. I've followed his career and was thrilled to learn of the approval of Golden Rice. It is upsetting to learn the people at Golden Rice were discourteous to you. That's a real shame. As for for Golden Rice, I was under the impression it has been approved for export to the US. Perhaps pending?

John Eggbert said...

Golden Rice may not want to associate their brand with Folta. The Alligator and his wife info about him could make anyone rethink working with him. His money returned from an abuse center cause they saw him kicking his wife, looks like some drunk driving , cheating on the wife. The allegations are serious. People reporting them seem wiling to stand up in court and share the evidence. Kavin Senapathy said she saw things that haven't been made public, Just saying, Folta needs to take a step back until this is resolved. Smart move by Golden Rice. Look at now he tossed them off here.

medsman said...

This is such an amazing blog, cannabis has a lot of great potentials, keep sharing looking forward in reading more from you. www.pureherbs.ml gives this information as well as Importances and health benefits of Buy Medicinal Weed dab shatter wax CBD/THC Oil online| Best recreational cannabis canada This cannabis also helps purify our system as we can see below
Increase your butts ,hips and boobs with the best quality hydrogel here online
Buy macrolane buttock injection 1500cc online
Buy 4-cprc crystal online
dysport-2x500iu-for-sale-online You can as well holla at purechems884@gmail.com for more details