Skip to main content

FitBit or TwitBit? Bad Science that Hurts Family Farmers

I'm always sensitive to which food and fitness companies abandon science and peddle woo.  I'm sad to say that FitBit has a blog post that promotes the Environmental Working Groups "Dirty Dozen".  The "Dirty Dozen" is this activist group's annual attack on specific fruit and vegetable industries, perpetrated to scare people into organic produce. 

FitBit nutrition editor Becky Duffett completely drops the ball on this one and makes an indictment of an industry based on a fancy activist website, and ignores simple facts.  Instead of consulting scientists and farmers that work with strawberry and know the facts, she takes an activist group's word that conventional strawberries are toxic nuggets of death and should never be eaten. 

FitBit falls for the "Dirty Dozen" ruse without any critical analysis, making statements that harm American specialty crop farmers. 

The author reiterates the EWG claim that, "98 percent (of strawberries) had detectable pesticide residues, 40 percent had residues from 10 or more pesticides and some had residues from up to 17 different pesticides."

First of all, what does "detected" mean?  We can measure levels that are tens of thousands, millions, billions of times below any toxicity thresholds.  Just because it is there on the edge of detection does not mean it is harmful. 

Furthermore, strawberry farmers do not use ten, let alone seventeen different pesticides. A phone call to a strawberry farmer, grower organization, or university plant pathologist would have sorted that out. 

You can listen to my interview with Dr. Natalia Peres on this very topic here. (starts at 30 minutes) 

The bottom line is that while strawberries are a fungicide-intensive crop, they are applied at safe levels for human consumption and are used sparingly.  The website advises farmers when conditions are most conducive to fungal outbreaks and they apply fungicides only at those times.  Thanks to such tools fungicide use is extremely low.  Ag chemicals are expensive, and farmers use them only to save a crop from a pathogen. 

I eat them right out of the field without even washing them. Of course, you always should wash your produce.  Sometimes you're in the middle of the field, the aroma is awesome, and you just gotta...

And the article discusses the other "dirty" eleven, and in fairness does mention what EWG considers "clean".  What a crock. 

This is troublesome because FitBit produces fitness tools that should be science based.  When they promote bogus claims about health and food, it gives me pause that I can trust any of their concepts or products.

For the record, I did once own a FitBit.  The band was trash, I lost it, and bought a Garmin that I really like. 

Popular posts from this blog

Scientific American Destroys Public Trust in Science

This is a sad epitaph, parting words to an old friend that is now gone, leaving in a puff of bitter betrayal. 
When I was a kid it was common for my mom to buy me a magazine if I was sick and home from school.  I didn't want MAD Magazine or comic books.  I preferred Scientific American
The once stalwart publication held a unique spot at the science-public interface, bringing us interesting and diverse stories of scientific interest, long before the internet made such content instantly accessible.  It was our trusted pipeline to the new edges of scientific discovery, from the mantle of the earth to the reaches of space, and every critter in between.
But like so much of our trusted traditional science media, Scientific American has traded its credibility for the glitz of post-truth non-scientific beliefs and the profits of clickbait.The problem is that when a trusted source publishes false information (or worse, when it hijacked by activists) it destroys trust in science, trust in s…

Chipotle's Ag-vertising to Fix their Anti-Ag Image

After years of anti-farmer rhetoric, disgusting anti-agriculture videos, and trashing farmer seed choice, Chipotle now seems to have found a love for the American farmer that is as warm and inviting as the gooey core of a steak burrito.  Their new "Cultivate the Future of Farming" campaign raises awareness of the hardship being experienced in agriculture, and then offers their thoughts and some seed grants in order to reverse it. 

But are they solving a problem that they were instrumental in creating? 

The crisis in agriculture is real, with farmers suffering from low prices, astronomical costs, and strangling regulation.  Farmer suicides are a barometer of the crisis.  Farms, from commodity crops to dairies, are going out of business daily. It is good to see a company raising awareness. 

From Chipotle's website- The "challenge is real" and "It's a hard living"-- and companies like Chipotle were central in creating those problems. 

However, Chipotle&#…

Mangling Reality and Targeting Scientists

Welcome to 2019, and one thing that remains constant is that scientists engaging the public will continue to be targeted for harassment and attempted reputation harm.  

The good news is that it is not working as well as it used to.  People are disgusted by their tactics, and only a handful of true-believers acknowledge their sites as credible. 

But for those on the fence I thought it might be nice to post how a website like SourceWatch uses a Wikipedia-mimic interface to spread false and/or misleading information about public scientists. 

Don't get me wrong, this is not crying victim.  I'm actually is screaming empowerment.  I spent the time to correct the record, something anyone can check.  Please look into their allegations and mine, and see who has it right. 

This is published by the Center for Media and Democracy.  Sadly, such pages actually threaten democracy by providing a forum for false information that makes evidence-based decisions in policy issues more challenging.  It…