Skip to main content

Arctic Wheat? More Non-Browning Crops!

Those quick to criticize genetic engineering in food were not pleased with the Simplot non-browning potato or the non-browning Arctic Apple.  In these cases the enzyme polyphenol oxidase (PPO) is disabled using a genetic engineering approach. Without this enzyme, plant materials do not turn off colors upon exposure to air, keeping postharvest quality high.

Everyone from Michael Hansen to Dr. Oz went on the warpath, generating fear and doubt about the safety of the apple upon its release.  Criticisms abounded on the web, claiming that the new products were dangerous, that PPO was important, and that nobody knows what is going to happen if we eat non-browning produce. 

Those of us that think about food and crop biology on a daily basis know of examples where defects in PPO have been of interest for a long time.  One great example is the golden raisin.  No PPO activity, and plant breeders and consumers celebrated new little dried weird fruits that were clear and golden rather than dark and brown. That was in 1962. 

Nobody really got too nervous about golden raisins.  

Snowy white noodles come from hard white wheat, varieties that do not produce browning or greying upon processing. 

Now you get what we can think of as Arctic Wheat-- no browning, snow-white, flour.  The genes for PPO are not functioning, nobody really knows why, but it just is that way. 

And nobody cares.  Nobody except for wheat farmers that can grow a new high-value product for the Asian market.  Oh, and billions of people that prefer a pasty-white noodle. This is super cool. 

The product comes from USDA-ARS, yes a public laboratory and your tax dollars. Wheat breeder Bob.Graybosch developed the new line from crosses of forgotten varieties present in the National Small Grains Collection in Idaho.  Two lines were especially useful, originating from Australia and entering the collection in 1930. These old lines with low amounts of PPO were bred together, and the resulting lines had almost no PPO activity. 

These genetic lines can now be used to cross to elite wheat varieties, and remove that compound that turns noodles brown or grey. 

So let's get this straight.  If you decrease PPO activity using native gene sequences in potato and apple, and then safety test them-- that is unacceptable and must be labeled. 

But if you decrease PPO activity through random mating, with no idea how the genes are turned off or what mutations cause it in raisins or wheat-- that's okay. 

Precision and predictability be damned.  The Frankenfood Paradox again. 

This is also a great story about how we can improve food quality by breeding, and that those archived varieties still house some useful genetics.  It is great that we live in a time and place where such resources can find utility again. 

Popular posts from this blog

What Is Their Goal?

I'm in my eleventh day in Europe.  I taught a wonderful science communication workshop, enjoyed time with many students and postdocs.  I mentored early-career faculty and reviewed the work and provided guidance to shape the future of a rising-star of an institution.  I was honored to speak at Brain Bar, a wonderful conference about the future. 

All of this came on my departure from social media, particularly Twitter. I've been watching and reading.  I also took down the majority of this blog.  I need to get my head down.  My mental health is taking a hit and the personal and professional inconvenience of being doxed and harassed is getting extreme. Here's what is happening now. 

Bank Accounts, Retirement Doxxed.

Somehow a former journalist turned hate-monger named Michael Balter obtained my personal records.  It is not hard to do.  Paul Thacker and University of California San Francisco posted my social security number a few months ago.  Once you have that, you find my birthd…

Scientific American Destroys Public Trust in Science

This is a sad epitaph, parting words to an old friend that is now gone, leaving in a puff of bitter betrayal. 
When I was a kid it was common for my mom to buy me a magazine if I was sick and home from school.  I didn't want MAD Magazine or comic books.  I preferred Scientific American
The once stalwart publication held a unique spot at the science-public interface, bringing us interesting and diverse stories of scientific interest, long before the internet made such content instantly accessible.  It was our trusted pipeline to the new edges of scientific discovery, from the mantle of the earth to the reaches of space, and every critter in between.
But like so much of our trusted traditional science media, Scientific American has traded its credibility for the glitz of post-truth non-scientific beliefs and the profits of clickbait.The problem is that when a trusted source publishes false information (or worse, when it hijacked by activists) it destroys trust in science, trust in s…

Chipotle's Ag-vertising to Fix their Anti-Ag Image

After years of anti-farmer rhetoric, disgusting anti-agriculture videos, and trashing farmer seed choice, Chipotle now seems to have found a love for the American farmer that is as warm and inviting as the gooey core of a steak burrito.  Their new "Cultivate the Future of Farming" campaign raises awareness of the hardship being experienced in agriculture, and then offers their thoughts and some seed grants in order to reverse it. 

But are they solving a problem that they were instrumental in creating? 

The crisis in agriculture is real, with farmers suffering from low prices, astronomical costs, and strangling regulation.  Farmer suicides are a barometer of the crisis.  Farms, from commodity crops to dairies, are going out of business daily. It is good to see a company raising awareness. 

From Chipotle's website- The "challenge is real" and "It's a hard living"-- and companies like Chipotle were central in creating those problems. 

However, Chipotle&#…