Can't Get Seeds for Independent Research?

-
One of the most lame complaints levied by those opposed to trangenic technology is that scientists just can't get seeds to do the independent research.  I've noted 3-4 ways that seeds may be obtained in this blog over time.

It is the laziest complaint- a sure sign of people not even willing to do cursory leg work, and simply parrot the junk people tell them.  I can get seeds in a few days- they are as close as your local seed catalog.  Just for fun, I looked in Hummert's catalog today.


The 2014 catalog has transgenic seeds for sale.  


They only sell 'roundup ready' sweet corn, but that's still something.  Anyone wanting to seriously examine the product certainly could, and any of the half-dozen or so scientists that claim that this is evil technology could do it too-- if they wanted to. 



Top of page 16- Oh, I guess it is pretty easy to get. 

Of course, there are a few technical issues at play.  First, you'll have to sign a contract to buy them that will keep you from propagating them and even doing research.  We'll come back to that.  Second, there is no comparable isogenic line (the line without the transgene) so it is hard to make a direct comparison.

These are the two goalposts that will be moved here. 

What about the contract?  Here's what I'd do if I had some evidence of GM harm from preliminary experiments.  I'd buy a few different lines, but a few non-GM lines and do the experiments.  When the results came back, I'd publish them.  Then I'd get my Nobel Prize! 

Afraid of being sued for researching the seeds?  Well, GE Seralini's famous lumpy rat retracted paper claimed to use Monsanto GM corn.  Even after that debacle there's no news that he has been sued for using the seeds off of contract (in a way, BigAg probably doesn't mind giving them enough rope). 

So why hasn't there been any independent research?  Because any scientist that looks at this issue does not see any evidence of harm.  What scientist is going to dedicate time, money and resources to test a hypothesis that makes no sense?  What postdoc or grad student is going to actually want to do this kind of work?  What funding organization is going to support it?  

The bottom line is that seeds can be obtained and tested.  Nobody wants to do it.  Nobody except for the armchair internet scientists that know more than the rest of us. 







Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: The Need to Grow

-
Image
The recurring ads on Facebook pulled at me to watch The Need to Grow , a documentary film about food and farming.  As someone connected with these areas professionally and personally, I thought it would be worth a watch.  Here is a review. First the good things.  The film is nicely shot and well written.  The majority of the work builds on themes such as nutritious diets healthy soils, and efficient energy. Those are the central underlying values of the film, and ones that I wholly endorse.  However, where the film falls apart is in its approaches to achieve those end points.  Two of the "experts" recruited for the film are none other than Jeffrey Smith and Vandana Shiva, two people with little training in science or farming (and no, Vandana Shiva is not a physicist as the film claims).  The narrator is actress Rosario Dawson, who early in the film makes the proclamation, "Agriculture is the most destructive human activity on the planet." It is clear where t
Read more

Food Babe Visits My University

-
Image
It was 6:30 pm in the lab and I was just thinking about the last things I'd need to get done before I could go home.  Typical night.  Usually I'm riding home about 7 pm, but an email popped up asking me if I was going to go watch the Food Babe.  A click on a link would take me to the note on a UF Dean for Students Good Food Revolution Events website.  Vani Hari would be spreading her corrupt message of bogus science and abject food terrorism here at the University of Florida. Oh joy. There's something that dies inside when you are a faculty member that works hard to teach about food, farming and science, and your own university brings in a crackpot to unravel all of the information you have brought to students. She might have started from honest roots.  Her story says she was duped by an organic yogurt stand (join the club) into buying taro toppings that were filled with artificial, non-organic colors.  She realized that she could use social media to coalesce
Read more

Shame on Pediatrics. Rejecting Scientist's Comments

-
 A lot has been said about the journal Pediatrics December 2023 Clinical Report on "Using GMOs on Children". The poor scholarship and citation bias are alarming, and the bias against safe technology is clear.  When I wrote to editor-in-chief Dr. Lewis First, he indicated that I was invited to submit a response to the article that would be posted below the article on its website. I submitted my response, and it was not published on the site. My guess is that it illuminated the bankruptcies of the article in a manner that ran counter to the authors', editor's and journal's narrative.  So I'll publish my comment here.  Dear Pediatrics Readership,  The article by Abrams et al. represents a stunning example of how misinformation spreads- even through a credible conduit. Pediatrics is a respected journal, so when a paper implies a technology is dangerous, physicians and the general public take note. That’s good. But if the message runs counter to the scientific con
Read more