Biotech Literacy Day Talks!

-
For all of you that could not see the Biotech Literacy Day talks in real time- here are the links! 
If they don't work on the click, cut and paste!
You may have to download the small SilverLight Plugin!


1. Dr. Kevin Folta  UF/IFAS Horticultural Sciences Department
   Genetically Engineered Crops in 2014: What Are They and How Do They Work? - 24 minutes
http://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/b3980f891e9445f881fdbe8a09fdb0301d
2. Dr. Bruce Chassy  University of Illinois@Urbana-Champaign         
    "Risks vs. Benefits  Health, Safety and Environment"  - 36 minutes 
http://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/4789e14d844c4a74aba2d7df829b132a1d
3. Dr. Val Giddings  Innovation Technology & Information Foundation 
    "Public Policy, Testing, Labeling, Patents" -  27 minutes


http://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/e29938267e744894a15b99ef2eb427881d
4. Tamar Haspel  The Washington Post 
    "That can�t possibly be true! Engaging and Persuasive Science Communication" - 26 minutes
 http://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/bbcdc4b65d3641d6b0914330fcc61e841d
5. Robert Wager  Vancouver Island University 
    "What Does Science Say About Popular GMO Myths?" - 30 minutes
http://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/5041226c87c14755867ca8c845bbaec51d
 6. Dr. Karl Haro von Mogel  University of Wisconsin � Madison
    "BIOTECH 2.0 - The Next Wave of GMOs"  - 34 minutes
 http://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/daba6de4c35d4f298ff36848c42b97f11d
7. Jon Entine, Moderator  Genetic Literacy Project 
    Presenters Panel  Question & Answer Session - 27 minutes
http://mediasite.video.ufl.edu/Mediasite/Play/ce6bd628daeb4c7eac9109f505b412971d

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: The Need to Grow

-
Image
The recurring ads on Facebook pulled at me to watch The Need to Grow , a documentary film about food and farming.  As someone connected with these areas professionally and personally, I thought it would be worth a watch.  Here is a review. First the good things.  The film is nicely shot and well written.  The majority of the work builds on themes such as nutritious diets healthy soils, and efficient energy. Those are the central underlying values of the film, and ones that I wholly endorse.  However, where the film falls apart is in its approaches to achieve those end points.  Two of the "experts" recruited for the film are none other than Jeffrey Smith and Vandana Shiva, two people with little training in science or farming (and no, Vandana Shiva is not a physicist as the film claims).  The narrator is actress Rosario Dawson, who early in the film makes the proclamation, "Agriculture is the most destructive human activity on the planet." It is clear where t
Read more

Food Babe Visits My University

-
Image
It was 6:30 pm in the lab and I was just thinking about the last things I'd need to get done before I could go home.  Typical night.  Usually I'm riding home about 7 pm, but an email popped up asking me if I was going to go watch the Food Babe.  A click on a link would take me to the note on a UF Dean for Students Good Food Revolution Events website.  Vani Hari would be spreading her corrupt message of bogus science and abject food terrorism here at the University of Florida. Oh joy. There's something that dies inside when you are a faculty member that works hard to teach about food, farming and science, and your own university brings in a crackpot to unravel all of the information you have brought to students. She might have started from honest roots.  Her story says she was duped by an organic yogurt stand (join the club) into buying taro toppings that were filled with artificial, non-organic colors.  She realized that she could use social media to coalesce
Read more

Shame on Pediatrics. Rejecting Scientist's Comments

-
 A lot has been said about the journal Pediatrics December 2023 Clinical Report on "Using GMOs on Children". The poor scholarship and citation bias are alarming, and the bias against safe technology is clear.  When I wrote to editor-in-chief Dr. Lewis First, he indicated that I was invited to submit a response to the article that would be posted below the article on its website. I submitted my response, and it was not published on the site. My guess is that it illuminated the bankruptcies of the article in a manner that ran counter to the authors', editor's and journal's narrative.  So I'll publish my comment here.  Dear Pediatrics Readership,  The article by Abrams et al. represents a stunning example of how misinformation spreads- even through a credible conduit. Pediatrics is a respected journal, so when a paper implies a technology is dangerous, physicians and the general public take note. That’s good. But if the message runs counter to the scientific con
Read more