Illumination is here to help you separate the science from the junk.
The blog Illumination was originally prepared to present my personal thoughts of science and its interface with society. Carl Sagan said it best; we live in a world filled with science and technology, where nobody knows anything about science and technology. We live in a world filled with charlatans and scam artists, malevolent activists and dangerous pseudoscientists. There is a place for scientists to help buffer the public, especially those most vulnerable, from these harmful forces.
I’m a scientist and I love to read, learn and then share science. It is what I do. Full time. I don’t have a family, I don’t have hobbies and have yet to hit a mid-life crisis. The world is filled with fascination and I’m so fortunate to contribute to it.
I like to use the current topics of public scientific discussion to teach about logical fallacy, critical thinking, evaluation of science, and skepticism in general.
The problem is that many people do not agree with science. When public figures speak of the science of climate change, GMOs, vaccination or other topics, some take offense, as scientific ideas collide with their worldviews. There is retaliation against science and scientists that dare to present an evidence-based perspective.
Over the last several years I have found myself discussing transgenic crops and biotechnology, familiarly referred to as GMOs. I’m glad to use this blog as a platform for information dissemination and discussion. I also occasionally write for Biofortified and Science 2.0.
In 2013 I made a lot of people angry. From activists to Hawaii to fans of Dr. Don M. Huber, many are not happy with my role in science communication, and more appropriately, scientific illumination of suspect concepts held dear by those with limited scientific acumen. I have been effective in changing minds and sharing science.
Over the last few months, those who scream accusations of being unfairly attacked and silenced, are now attacking and trying to silence those of us that attempt to distill and communicate science. Oh sweet irony.
In a world of aggressive science denial and internet-fueled self-empowerment, effective communicators can’t be tolerated. The flying monkeys are out. I've been hassled in many ways, some personally, some professionally. There is a new push to hush me by contacting my university’s administration and complaining.
So I’ll state it clearly here, again. The thoughts presented here are my own, these are my personal statements and I stand by them. They are not necessarily the viewpoints of the University of Florida or the Horticultural Sciences Department, so please don’t make that assumption.
If you have a problem with something I’ve said, let me know. I’ve been wrong before and would love to discuss the issue or make a correction. I learn something new every day.
The wrong way to handle this is to bother my boss and my boss’ boss, the governor or anyone else in an attempt to silence my level-headed, evidence-based discussion of biotechnology.
Sure, it might just work, as someone someday might ask me not to participate in hot-button discussions with lay audiences. Universities are just like any other place and they don’t want hassles, unfounded bad press or anything to taint perception. It takes a lot of time and resources to unravel a false accusation.
However, my university has stood by me solidly. It is part of our mission as a Land Grant University to share science with the public.
Let’s consider the irony. The people that claim disdain for strong arm tactics by companies against farmers, silencing of critics and stifling of scientific information, are now using strong-arm tactics in an attempt to silence a public, independent scientist.
We live in challenging times where we need science to solve our most pressing problems. In order to maximize and hasten scientific impact we need the public to understand science, especially in hot-button areas. We need everyone to learn the difference between real science and internet rants.
2014 will be a great year for science and a great year for Illumination. I'm glad to have this little forum to provide a creative analysis of the current situation in biotech. It is also wonderful to read the feedback, get the emails, both supportive and antagonistic. I learn a lot from the process.