Climate Conspiracy, Part II
Today's blog follows up on the Climate Conspiracy blog posted last week. It was based on two conversations I had with a clear climate denialist. The first entry details a discussion where the other party has direct evidence of bias in funding for climate research... that is, until I call him on it. Today I'll provide another example. It is interesting to note the climate denialists follow the same exact scheme as those that deny evolution or the safety of GMO food. There always is a conspiracy, chocked full of secrets. There are threats and intimidation, nameless figures and warped senses of victimization. This is the second part of my discussion with James McGaha. Again, we had a very nice conversation where I did a lot more listening than talking. It was a private conversation, he had no idea that I'd write here about it (neither did I), but it is a good case for understanding science denialism. During the conversation he told me that he...